why are natural languages not suited for programming of computers?
Natural languages, such as English, French, or Chinese, are not well-suited for programming computers for several reasons:
1. Ambiguity: Natural languages are inherently ambiguous. Words and phrases can have multiple meanings depending on the context. This ambiguity makes it difficult for computers to accurately interpret instructions. In contrast, programming languages are designed to be unambiguous, with specific syntax and rules that allow for precise interpretation by computers.
2. Lack of Precision: Natural languages often lack the precision required for programming. They may have vague or inconsistent definitions, making it challenging to express complex algorithms or logic. Programming languages, on the other hand, provide a set of precise instructions and operations that can be followed explicitly by a computer.
3. Lack of Structure: Natural languages do not have a formal structure like programming languages do. Programming languages have clear syntax and grammar rules that need to be followed, allowing for proper organization and structural integrity of the code. Natural languages are more flexible and free-flowing, which is not ideal for coding.
4. Human-oriented: Natural languages are primarily designed for human communication, taking into account the nuances, emotions, and context that humans use to understand each other. Programming languages, however, are designed to be parsed and executed by machines efficiently, focusing on logic and precise instructions rather than human comprehensibility.
To overcome these limitations, programming languages have been developed to enable programmers to precisely convey instructions to computers. These languages use a structured syntax that eliminates ambiguity and provides clear instructions for the computer to follow. By using programming languages, programmers are able to write code that is easily understood by the computer and can be executed accurately.