Which measure of variability—range or IQR—best describes the spread of the dataset?
For a statistics assignment, Shayna randomly surveyed students on how many hours per week they spend playing online games:
1.0 1.0 2.0 6.5 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 12.0 12.5 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 15.0 15.0 15.5 16.0 17.5 18.0
(1 point)
Responses
IQR; the distribution is symmetrical, or close to it, and there aren’t any outliers in the dataset.
IQR; the distribution is symmetrical, or close to it, and there aren’t any outliers in the dataset.
Range; the distribution is skewed, and there are outliers in the dataset.
Range; the distribution is skewed, and there are outliers in the dataset.
Range; the distribution is symmetrical, or close to it, and there aren’t any outliers in the dataset.
Range; the distribution is symmetrical, or close to it, and there aren’t any outliers in the dataset.
IQR; the distribution is skewed, and there are outliers in the dataset.
IQR; the distribution is symmetrical, or close to it, and there aren’t any outliers in the dataset.
In this case, the Interquartile Range (IQR) would be the better measure of variability to describe the spread of the dataset. This is because the IQR helps to describe the middle 50% of the data and is less susceptible to outliers compared to the range. Since the distribution appears to be symmetrical and there are no clear outliers in the dataset, the IQR is a more appropriate measure to use.