#21 How does the author of “Are GMOs Really Safe?” support an argument about GMOs and pesticides?
A. by stating that GMOs require increasing amounts of pesticides
B. by suggesting that GMOs can process pesticides in a healthy way
C. by claiming that pesticides damage GMO crops more than non-GMO crops
D. by explaining that organic pesticides can be used effectively on GMOs
#22 Constructed-Response (SHORT 1-3 paragraphs)
How are the viewpoints of “GMOs Can Feed the World” and “Are GMOs Really Safe?” different? Use details from BOTH passages to support your answer. Write your answer in the space provided below.
The viewpoints of "GMOs Can Feed the World" and "Are GMOs Really Safe?" differ in their perspectives on the safety and benefits of GMOs. "GMOs Can Feed the World" argues that GMOs have the potential to address global hunger and food insecurity by increasing crop yields and improving nutritional content. The author supports this argument by citing examples of successful GMO crops and their impact on farmers in developing countries.
On the other hand, "Are GMOs Really Safe?" raises concerns about the potential risks associated with GMOs, particularly in relation to pesticides. The author suggests that GMOs may lead to increased pesticide use, leading to potential environmental and health risks. This argument is supported by evidence of the link between GMOs and pesticide resistance in insects and weeds.
Overall, the main difference between the viewpoints is that "GMOs Can Feed the World" focuses on the potential benefits of GMOs in addressing food scarcity, while "Are GMOs Really Safe?" highlights the potential risks and uncertainties surrounding GMO technology.