In a food pyramid, there is typically less biomass at the top (i.e., there are very few individual tertiary consumers, whereas there are numerous individual producers). In three to five sentences, explain this phenomenon, citing evidence relating to energy flow and how plants support ecosystems. Make it sound like a 7th grader typed it out pls and make it as short and as understandable as possible
In a food pyramid, there's not many animals at the tippy top because energy gets lost when it moves up through the levels. Plants make the most energy from the sun, so there's a lot of them. Animals that eat plants have less energy, so there's fewer of them. And then animals that eat other animals have even less energy, so there's only a few of them at the top. So basically, there's less animals at the top of the food chain because the energy from the sun gets less and less as it goes up.
can you make it smaller pls
In a food pyramid, there are more plants than plant-eating animals, and more plant-eating animals than meat-eating animals, because energy decreases as it goes up the food chain. Plants get the most energy from the sun, so there are lots of them. Animals that eat plants have less energy, so there are fewer of them. Animals that eat other animals have even less energy, so there are only a few at the top. So, fewer animals are at the top because energy decreases as it moves up the food chain.
