Ms Fabulous is a receptionist at a large law firm. She also considers herself an influencer with over 5000 followers on social media. She has always wanted fuller lips and makes an appointment with a Dr Fuller for a lip filler. Lip fillers are injections that give lips a more plump and full appearance. It is more generally referred to as dermal fillers.

Dr Fuller explains to Ms Fabulous that the lip filler procedure takes just a few minutes and is minimally invasive. The procedure is not permanent, and she will need future injections to maintain the lip fullness the filler creates. He further explains that she may have swelling or tenderness and bruising after the procedure, though the side effects should be minor. He also gave her a brochure that explained the aftercare procedure that she needed to follow.
The procedure goes according to plan, and after the initial slight bruising, Ms Fabulous’ lips have healed, and she is happy with the outcome. Almost six weeks after the procedure, Ms Fabulous develops what looks like a cold sore on her lip. She gets over-the-counter treatment for the cold sore, which appears to make it worse. When more sores appear, she makes an appointment with Dr Fuller, who informs her that she has a delayed allergic reaction to the filler that was used. By this time, the sores on Ms Fabulous’ lips appeared swollen and inflamed. Dr Fuller informed her that he had to refer her to an immunologist to treat the severe allergic reaction. Ms Fabulous was admitted to the hospital and incurred considerable expenses for the treatment.
Ms Fabulous was not able to work for six (6) weeks. The employer granted her sick leave payment for two (2) weeks and unpaid leave for the remainder of the time. She recovered well after the treatment although the sores left scars on her lips that would fade over time but never entirely disappear.
Ms Fabulous wants to institute a claim for medical negligence against Dr Fuller for the ordeal that she has been through. She felt humiliated by the experience and she incurred considerable expenses.
When she confronted Dr Fuller he told her that the allergic reaction that she suffered was very rare. He also said that she had contributed to the harm by using over-the-counter ointment, which worsened the reaction, instead of immediately contacting a doctor.
Instructions: Don't forget case law
Find a teammate in class. One of you will be the attorney for the plaintiff (Ms Fabulous) and the other for the defendant (Dr Fuller).
Attorney for plaintiff: draft a legal opinion in a PowerPoint presentation in which you set out the claim for the plaintiff. Explain specifically:
whether your client’s claim is based on contract or delict;
the types of harm suffered;
the damages claimed on her behalf.
Attorney for the defendant: draft a legal opinion in a PowerPoint presentation in which you respond to the claim set out by the Plaintiff. Explain specifically which defences are, in theory, available to your client and what your advice to him would be in the particular case.
Upload your PowerPoint presentation to Blackboard on/before 29 April 2024 at 12 pm (noon).
Present your arguments in class. You will each have 2 – 3 minutes to present your client’s case.
You have to substantiate your arguments with authority from case law.
Marks allocation: PowerPoint Presentation [10] + Oral Presentation [10] = 20 marks.

This is a hypothetical legal case scenario which requires students to prepare PowerPoint presentations and oral arguments for the plaintiff and defendant in a medical negligence claim. The case involves a receptionist who suffered a severe allergic reaction to lip filler injections and incurred significant expenses and emotional distress as a result. Students are asked to analyze the legal basis of the claim, the types of harm suffered, and the damages claimed by the plaintiff. They are also required to evaluate potential defenses available to the defendant and provide legal advice on how to respond to the claim. The use of case law to substantiate arguments is also emphasized in this exercise. Overall, this exercise is designed to assess students' ability to analyze legal issues, develop persuasive arguments, and apply relevant case law in a legal context.