President George HW Bush worked with other countries to diffuse conflict without the military before deciding to intervene with military force. How is this different from other Presidents' foreign policy? Do agree or disagree with the foreign policy strategy? Why or why not?(4 points)
President George HW Bush's approach to foreign policy differed from other Presidents in that he focused on diplomatic solutions and cooperation with other countries before resorting to military force. This approach, known as multilateralism, prioritized building alliances and working together with other nations to address conflicts and threats.
I agree with this foreign policy strategy as it emphasizes the importance of diplomacy and collective action in maintaining peace and stability in the world. By seeking diplomatic solutions and building alliances with other countries, President Bush was able to avoid unnecessary conflicts and promote cooperation among nations.
Furthermore, this approach is also more cost-effective and less destructive than relying solely on military force. By utilizing diplomacy and working with other countries, the United States can address global challenges in a more collaborative and strategic manner.
Overall, I believe that President George HW Bush's foreign policy strategy of prioritizing diplomacy and multilateralism is a more effective and ethical approach to international relations compared to the unilateral use of military force.