In 3–5 sentences compare the Eastern and Western Fronts of World War I in terms of their geography and strategies.
The Eastern Front of World War I was characterized by vast, open spaces and long fronts stretching across Eastern Europe. The terrain was often harsh and difficult to navigate, with vast distances between fortified positions. In contrast, the Western Front was much more concentrated, with trench lines that stretched for hundreds of miles from the English Channel to Switzerland.
Strategically, the Eastern Front saw more fluid movement and large-scale offensives due to the vast expanses of open terrain. The armies on this front often relied on maneuver warfare and large-scale encirclement tactics. On the Western Front, the strategies were more focused on trench warfare and attrition, with both sides digging in and launching massive offensives to break through enemy lines.
Overall, the Eastern Front was more mobile and dynamic, while the Western Front was characterized by static, defensive warfare. The differing geographies of the two fronts greatly influenced the strategies employed by the belligerent powers during World War I.