Evaluate, by comparing at least 2 jurisprudential theories that address non-state actors’ duties regarding ‘social justice’, which of these jurisprudential theories, according to you, best attains the stated aims to achieve social justice in the first paragraph of the Grootboom case as well as in the Preamble of the Constitution. Motivate your opinion throughout. Your answer should be between 200-250 words in length. compare kwame kgeykes theory and pastor singers theory
Kwame Gyekye’s theory focuses on the principles of individual rights and responsibilities, emphasizing the importance of personal autonomy and self-determination. According to Gyekye, individuals have a duty to promote the common good through their actions and decisions. This theory aligns with the idea of social justice as outlined in the Grootboom case and the Constitution, as it places emphasis on personal agency and accountability in addressing social inequalities.
On the other hand, Pastor Singer’s theory of collective responsibility highlights the need for collective action and solidarity in promoting social justice. Singer argues that individuals have a moral obligation to contribute to the well-being of society as a whole, particularly in addressing issues of poverty and inequality. This theory resonates with the notion of Ubuntu and the spirit of community espoused in South African jurisprudence.
In comparing the two theories, Gyekye’s emphasis on individual rights and responsibilities may be more aligned with the constitutional principles of dignity and equality, as it emphasizes personal agency and accountability. However, Singer’s theory of collective responsibility may better capture the interconnectedness of social justice issues and the need for collective action in addressing systemic inequalities. Ultimately, a combination of both theories may be necessary to effectively achieve social justice in a comprehensive and sustainable manner.