An explanation of the arguments for and against wrongful life claims.
Arguments in favor of wrongful life claims:
1. Compensation: Proponents argue that individuals who are born with severe disabilities or genetic disorders should have the right to seek compensation for the pain and suffering they endure as a result of being born. They argue that these individuals did not choose to be born in such circumstances and should therefore be entitled to seek justice.
2. Accountability: Some argue that wrongful life claims hold medical professionals accountable for negligence or malpractice that may have resulted in a child being born with severe disabilities. Holding these professionals accountable can help prevent future cases of wrongful births.
Arguments against wrongful life claims:
1. Ethical concerns: Opponents argue that allowing wrongful life claims can set a dangerous precedent by implying that some lives are not worth living. They argue that this could lead to discrimination against individuals with disabilities and undermine the value of all human life.
2. Legal challenges: Establishing damages in wrongful life claims can be difficult, as it involves complex and contentious questions about the value of a life and the extent of compensation that should be awarded. Some argue that the legal system is ill-equipped to handle these complex issues and that wrongful life claims could lead to unpredictable and inconsistent outcomes in court.