Give an example of the third speaker speech of the negative side in a debate
Ladies and gentlemen, esteemed judges, and honorable opponents,
I stand before you today representing the negative side of this debate, and I would like to address some key points brought up by the affirmative team.
First and foremost, my opponents have argued that implementing stricter gun control laws will reduce gun violence in our society. However, it is important to note that criminals do not abide by laws. By restricting law-abiding citizens from owning firearms, we are only disarming the innocent and leaving them defenseless against those who do not follow the law.
Furthermore, my opponents have suggested that increasing government surveillance is necessary to prevent terrorist attacks. While national security is crucial, we must not sacrifice our privacy and civil liberties in the process. There are alternative measures that can be taken, such as improving intelligence sharing and diplomatic efforts, that do not infringe upon our rights as citizens.
In conclusion, the negative side believes that the solutions proposed by the affirmative team are not only ineffective but also detrimental to our freedoms and rights. We urge you to consider the potential consequences of implementing these policies and to prioritize the protection of our individual liberties. Thank you.