Use the following to answer the question: Do you agree with this analysis? Give at least 2 reasons you either agree or disagree. Use an example from current events, the news, or historical events mentioned in the unit to support your answer. (6 points) BoldItalicUnderline"However [political parties] may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards
I agree with this analysis for two main reasons.
First, history has shown us multiple instances where political parties have allowed cunning and ambitious individuals to manipulate and take advantage of the system for their own gain. For example, in the Watergate scandal in the 1970s, members of the Republican party were implicated in a series of illegal activities, including a break-in at the Democratic National Committee headquarters. This scandal ultimately led to the resignation of President Richard Nixon and exposed the corrupt practices that can arise within a political party.
Second, current events also support the idea that political parties can be used as tools for ambitious individuals to seize power. In recent years, we have seen polarizing figures rise to prominence within their respective parties by exploiting the divisions and grievances of the electorate. For example, former President Donald Trump utilized the Republican party to advance his own agenda and maintain a stranglehold on power, despite facing numerous allegations of unethical behavior and abuse of power.
Overall, history and current events illustrate the potential dangers of political parties falling under the control of unprincipled individuals who seek to subvert the will of the people. It is essential to remain vigilant and hold political parties accountable to prevent the erosion of democratic principles.