Compare the socioeconomic structure of the elite class in both burgess concenteic zone model an latin American city structure model
The Burgess concentric zone model and the Latin American city structure model represent two different ways of organizing urban spaces, and as such they have different implications for the socioeconomic structure of the elite class in each model.
In the Burgess concentric zone model, the elite class typically resides in the central business district or the innermost zone of the city. This area is characterized by high property values, luxury housing, and expensive amenities. The elite class in this model tends to have high levels of income and wealth, and they often have access to the best schools, healthcare, and other services. The elite class in the Burgess model is generally well-connected and influential, and they have a significant impact on the overall economic and social dynamics of the city.
In contrast, the Latin American city structure model tends to be more fragmented and stratified, with a clear divide between the elite class and the rest of the population. In this model, the elite class typically resides in gated communities or exclusive neighborhoods that are physically separated from the rest of the city. These areas are characterized by high levels of security, luxury amenities, and a high standard of living. The elite class in the Latin American city model tends to be more isolated and less integrated into the wider urban fabric, leading to greater social and economic disparities between different groups within the city.
Overall, the socioeconomic structure of the elite class in the Burgess concentric zone model is more centralized and integrated, while in the Latin American city structure model it is more segregated and stratified. The elite class in the Burgess model tends to have a more direct impact on the overall dynamics of the city, while in the Latin American model they are more isolated and insulated from the rest of the population.