Evaluate the extent to which the service delivery protest you have described in 2 above me or did not meet the requirements of processes that you have researched in 3 above
In the service delivery protest described above, it is evident that the protest did not fully meet the requirements of the processes researched in point 3 above.
Firstly, the protest did not adhere to the principle of non-violence as recommended in the researched processes. The protest turned violent with clashes between the protestors and law enforcement officials, resulting in property damage and injuries. This goes against the peaceful and non-violent approach advocated in the researched processes.
Secondly, the protest did not effectively engage in dialogue and negotiation with the relevant authorities to address their grievances. While the protestors demanded improved service delivery, there was no evidence of constructive dialogue or negotiation taking place with the government or service providers. This lack of communication and engagement with the authorities hinders the effectiveness of the protest in bringing about meaningful change.
Additionally, the protest did not follow the procedural requirements outlined in the researched processes, such as obtaining necessary permits, adhering to legal procedures, and organizing events in a peaceful and orderly manner. The protest appeared to be spontaneous and disorderly, lacking the necessary organization and structure to effectively convey their message.
Overall, the service delivery protest described above fell short in meeting the requirements of the researched processes, compromising its effectiveness and potentially hindering progress towards addressing the grievances of the protestors.