Writing task: which of the historian quoted in documents A and B do you agree with most strongly? Why? Use your knowledge of world war 11 and specific evidence from the documents to support your opinion.
I agree most strongly with the historian quoted in document A. The historian argues that World War II was caused by a combination of factors, including the Treaty of Versailles and the aggressive actions of Adolf Hitler. This explanation aligns with my own understanding of the events leading up to the war.
The Treaty of Versailles imposed harsh sanctions on Germany following World War I, which left the country economically devastated and humiliated. This created a breeding ground for resentment and nationalism, which Hitler exploited to rise to power. This is evidenced by Hitler's aggressive expansionist policies, such as the annexation of Austria and the invasion of Poland, which ultimately led to the outbreak of war.
Document A also mentions the role of other factors, such as the failure of the League of Nations to prevent aggression and the appeasement policies of Western powers. These additional factors further support the historian's argument that World War II was caused by a combination of complex issues.
In contrast, the historian quoted in document B primarily focuses on the role of Hitler and his ideology in causing the war, while downplaying the impact of other factors such as the Treaty of Versailles. While Hitler's actions were certainly a major catalyst for the war, I believe it is important to consider the broader context in which these actions took place.
Overall, I find the explanation presented in document A to be more comprehensive and persuasive in explaining the causes of World War II. By taking into account multiple factors and their interactions, this historian provides a more nuanced understanding of the complexities that preceded the war.