In your post, discuss the following with your peers:
Identify the chosen building. Why do you think the architect chose a pyramid for the shape of the building?
How would you design this building as a prism? Justify.
How would the change in shape affect the construction of the building?
How would the change in shape affect the use of the building? Use the concept of volume in this post.
Then read two of your peers’ posts. Respond to two of your peers:
For each post, explain why the pyramid or prism is a better shape for the building.
How would you improve on the identified pyramid-shaped building?
How would you improve on the alternate prism-shaped building?
Post a detailed response to the Relationship Between Volume of Prisms and Pyramids Discussion prompt. Then respond to two classmates' posts.
Participate in the discussion to learn more about buildings designed as pyramids or prisms.
Chosen building: The Louvre Pyramid in Paris, France.
I believe the architect chose a pyramid for the shape of the building for a few reasons. First, the pyramid shape is often associated with grandeur and historical significance, making it a fitting choice for an iconic museum like the Louvre. Additionally, the pyramid shape allows for a modern and unique design that contrasts with the traditional architecture of the Louvre Palace.
If I were to design this building as a prism, I would elongate the structure and create a more rectangular shape. This design would increase the internal volume of the building, providing more space for exhibitions and visitors. By increasing the base dimensions of the building, the prism shape would also allow for a more efficient use of space.
The change in shape from a pyramid to a prism would significantly affect the construction of the building. The pyramid shape of the Louvre Pyramid is made up of a series of glass panes that slope inward, creating a striking architectural feature. If the building were to be redesigned as a prism, the construction process would need to be reevaluated to accommodate the new shape.
In terms of the use of the building, the concept of volume is key. A prism-shaped building would offer more internal volume than the pyramid-shaped building, allowing for additional exhibition space and potentially increasing the number of visitors that could be accommodated. However, the prism shape may also result in a loss of the iconic and unique design that the pyramid shape provides.
Overall, the pyramid shape may be a better choice for the Louvre Pyramid due to its historical significance, visual appeal, and unique design. However, a prism shape could offer practical benefits in terms of increased internal volume and efficiency of space utilization. Balancing these factors would be key in determining the best design for the building.
In response to my peers' posts:
1. The pyramid shape may be a better choice for the Louvre Pyramid because it adds a sense of grandeur and historical significance to the building, fitting its role as a renowned museum. However, I would improve on the design by incorporating more sustainable materials and technologies to make the building more environmentally friendly.
2. The prism shape could offer practical benefits in terms of increased internal volume, but it may lack the visual impact and historical significance of the pyramid shape. To improve on the prism-shaped building, I would focus on incorporating innovative design elements to create a unique and visually appealing structure.