Use the excerpt from Huey P. Long's "Share Our Wealth" speech, given on March 12, 1935, to answer the question. And they proceeded with the NRA. Everything from a peanut stand to a power house had to have a separate book of rules and laws to regulate what they did. If a peanut stand started to parch a sack of goobers for sale, they had to be careful to go through the rule book. One slip and he went to jail. A little fellow who pressed a pair of pants went to jail because he charged 5 cents under the price set in the rule book. So they wrote their NRA rule book, codes, laws, etc. They got up over 900 of them. One would be as thick as an unabridged dictionary and as confusing as a study of the stars. It would take 40 lawyers to tell a shoe-shine stand how to operate and be certain he didn't go to jail. In 3–5 sentences, analyze Huey Long’s criticism of the New Deal. Cite specific details in the excerpt to support your analysis..

Huey Long criticizes the New Deal for its excessive bureaucracy and overregulation, specifically targeting the National Industrial Recovery Act (NRA). He points out how small businesses, like peanut stands and tailors, were being punished for minor infractions and how the multitude of rules and codes created confusion and hindered economic growth. Long's argument highlights the negative impact of government intervention on small businesses and the need for a simpler and more effective approach to economic reform.

use simpler terms

Huey Long didn't like how the New Deal made a lot of complicated rules for businesses to follow, like how much they could charge or what they could sell. He thought this made it hard for small businesses to operate without getting into trouble. Long believed that the government should make things easier for businesses to grow and succeed.