Much of the simulation involved making choices between lying to fit in versus telling the truth, which might result in being excluded from the group. How did the concept of honesty affect which path you completed for this simulation? Which do you think would be easier to fake—embodied or objectified cultural capital? Explain your reasoning.
In this simulation, the concept of honesty played a significant role in determining which path to take. On one hand, being honest and truthful may lead to exclusion from the group, as others may not appreciate or accept differing opinions. On the other hand, lying to fit in may lead to a feeling of guilt or dishonesty.
Personally, I believe that it would be easier to fake embodied cultural capital rather than objectified cultural capital. Embodied cultural capital refers to the skills, knowledge, and behaviors that individuals possess and use to navigate social situations. It is more intangible and subjective, making it potentially easier to fake or perform in certain settings.
Objectified cultural capital, on the other hand, refers to material possessions or external signs of status, such as expensive clothing or accessories. These are physical, tangible items that can be easily verified or discredited, making it more difficult to fake convincingly. Additionally, objectified cultural capital is often associated with financial resources, which may not be as easily accessible to everyone.
Overall, while both types of cultural capital can be faked to some extent, I believe that embodied cultural capital would be easier to manipulate and perform in order to fit in or gain acceptance in a social group.