Explain more on counterclaim that has the fallacies “slippery slope” and “appeal to tradition” about Pantene commercial
A counterclaim with the fallacy of slippery slope in relation to a Pantene commercial could be that featuring diverse representations of hair in their advertisements could lead to the normalization of unnatural hair colors and styles, ultimately leading to societal acceptance of extreme or unconventional grooming choices. This slippery slope argument suggests that by gradually increasing diversity in their commercials, Pantene could be contributing to a societal trend that may result in negative consequences.
On the other hand, a counterclaim with the fallacy of appeal to tradition could argue that Pantene should stick to traditional beauty standards in their commercials, showcasing only typical hairstyles and representations of femininity. The appeal to tradition fallacy suggests that because it has been the norm to feature traditional beauty ideals in commercial advertising, Pantene should continue to do so regardless of societal changes and movements towards inclusivity and diversity. This counterclaim fails to acknowledge the importance of representation and inclusivity in advertising and dismisses the need for progress and change in the industry.