In this discussion, you will discuss the Hawaii Annexation.

Post a detailed response to the discussion prompt. Then comment on at least two other posts.

To understand how you will be graded for this assignment, read the Discussion Guidelines and Rubric.

Using your knowledge of the text and the sources given, answer the question:
Should the U.S. have annexed Hawaii?

3 sentences

I believe that the U.S. should have annexed Hawaii because it was strategically located in the Pacific Ocean, which would have given the U.S. a foothold in the region. Additionally, Hawaii had a significant American population and commercial interests that would benefit from being part of the United States. However, the annexation was controversial at the time and some argued that it was done through coercion and without the consent of the native Hawaiians.

Comment on another post:

I agree with your points about the strategic importance of Hawaii and the benefits it would bring to the United States. It's important to consider the economic and military advantages that could be gained from annexing Hawaii. However, the concerns about the annexation being done without the consent of the native Hawaiians are also valid and raise ethical questions about the U.S.'s actions. It's a complex issue with both pros and cons to consider.

Comment on a different post:

I see your point about the strategic advantages of annexing Hawaii, but I struggle with the idea of taking over a sovereign nation without their consent. While there may have been benefits for the U.S., it's important to consider the impact on the native Hawaiian population and their right to self-determination. The annexation raises questions about imperialism and the ethical implications of expanding U.S. territory through force.