In 2 sentences, analyze the benefits and the drawbacks of direct democracy. Compare it to a representative democracy. Which form serves the interests of the public in different situations? Give examples.
Direct democracy allows for direct participation of the public in decision-making, promoting transparency and citizen engagement. However, it can be time-consuming, costly, and may not always result in outcomes that are in the best interest of the public. Representative democracy, on the other hand, allows for more efficient decision-making through elected officials but can also lead to disconnect between the government and the people. In situations where there is a need for quick decision-making and efficient governance, representative democracy may be more effective. However, in situations where public participation and transparency are prioritized, direct democracy may better serve the interests of the public. For example, Switzerland's system of direct democracy allows citizens to vote on a wide range of issues, promoting citizen engagement and accountability. On the other hand, representative democracies like the United States may struggle with gridlock and be influenced by special interest groups, leading to decisions that may not always reflect the will of the people.
