A new social media platform has been released. One of the features is that you can upvote and downvote posts. The algorithm for viewing posts makes it so that once you downvote a post you never see another post similar again. Why might this pose an ethical dilemma?(1 point)
Responses
It may provide a more moderate experience for the user.
It may provide a more moderate experience for the user.
It may hide opposing viewpoints, keeping people from seeing them and strengthening confirmation bias.
It may hide opposing viewpoints, keeping people from seeing them and strengthening confirmation bias.
It may promote opposing viewpoints, making them more visible.
It may promote opposing viewpoints, making them more visible.
It will provide a balanced experience so the use can be decided.
It may reinforce echo chambers and limit exposure to diverse perspectives.
please answer with the responses.
1. It may provide a more moderate experience for the user.
2. It may hide opposing viewpoints, keeping people from seeing them and strengthening confirmation bias.
3. It may promote opposing viewpoints, making them more visible.
4. It may reinforce echo chambers and limit exposure to diverse perspectives.
please answer with the responses from the question.
My apologies for the confusion. Here are the responses based on the question:
1. It may provide a more moderate experience for the user.
2. It may hide opposing viewpoints, keeping people from seeing them and strengthening confirmation bias.
3. It may promote opposing viewpoints, making them more visible.
4. It may reinforce echo chambers and limit exposure to diverse perspectives.