Space flights to other planets have long been a fixture of science fiction, and in 2017 the fiction appeared to come closer to reality when the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) announced it was prioritizing eventual piloted missions to Mars and other planets. (2) It may be too soon to start planning your Martian vacation, however: there are good reasons to doubt that humans will be able to undertake long-distance space flights in the foreseeable future.
(3) For example, the body loses muscle mass and bone density in low-gravity environments because the pressure of Earth’s atmosphere is removed. (4) Astronauts struggle to walk after six months in space; the effects of a three-year flight and a stay on Mars would be far greater. (5) Nevertheless, humans have a natural cycle of wakefulness and sleep attuned to daytime and nighttime on Earth. (6) Anyone who has experienced jet lag can attest to the mental and physical effects of disrupting this cycle, but we can only imagine the consequences of disrupting it for years.
(7) It is true that monitoring, exercise, and technological fixes like sunlight-simulating LED lights have shown some promise for diminishing these problems. (8) Other issues may be more troublesome. (9) Space missions are stressful, requiring long hours of repetitive activity performed in small, sterile spaces. (10) The stress lowers immune response even as outer-space conditions cause microbes in astronauts’ bodies to mutate, potentially resulting in unfriendly diseases. (11) Unless scientists can develop effective means of fighting these health risks, long-distance space travel may be too dangerous.
(12) With NASA’s attention directed to the problems of long space missions, it is certain that scientists will come up with creative solutions to the elevated risks to human well-being in space much as they have addressed dangers associated with shorter missions. (13) But it is also probable that further research will turn up new problems that have not even been identified yet. (14) It is thus likely that for many years to come, the only way for humans to have a first-hand experience exploring distant planets will be opening a book or going to the movies rather than hopping on a rocket.
Question
The writer is considering adding the following sentence after sentence 10.
Cosmic rays pose another health concern: a 2018 study from Georgetown University Medical Center found that prolonged exposure to cosmic radiation could lead to stomach and colon cancers.
Should the writer add this sentence after sentence 10 ?
Responses
Yes, because it provides data to support the claim in sentence 4 about the struggles astronauts experience upon returning to Earth.
Yes, because it provides data to support the claim in sentence 4 about the struggles astronauts experience upon returning to Earth.
Yes, because it makes a claim that supports the writer’s line of reasoning in the third paragraph.
Yes, because it makes a claim that supports the writer’s line of reasoning in the third paragraph.
Yes, because it logically demonstrates the outcome of the problem described in sentence 10.
Yes, because it logically demonstrates the outcome of the problem described in sentence 10.
No, because it contradicts the claim made in sentence 13 about NASA’s attempts to solve these problems.
No, because it contradicts the claim made in sentence 13 about NASA’s attempts to solve these problems.
No, because it interrupts the point the writer is making in the third paragraph with details that are only tangentially relevant.
Yes, because it logically demonstrates the outcome of the problem described in sentence 10.
By adding the sentence about cosmic rays and their potential health effects, the writer further supports the argument that long-distance space travel may be too dangerous due to various health risks astronauts may face. It enhances the discussion of health concerns in space and provides additional information about potential dangers that astronauts may encounter.