Why would a book about the Ojibwe written by someone who studies history be different from a story written by an Ojibwe person about their own life?
Which would be based more on personal experience and which would be based more on secondary research and interviews? Explain your thinking in 2-3 sentences.
A book about the Ojibwe written by a historian would likely be based on secondary research, interviews, and historical records, providing a broader perspective on the history and culture of the Ojibwe people. On the other hand, a story written by an Ojibwe person about their own life would be based more on personal experience, emotions, and firsthand accounts, offering a unique and authentic perspective that may not be captured in historical texts. Both sources of information are valuable in understanding the Ojibwe culture, but they provide different insights and nuances.
