Summarize the important parts of what the speaker is saying

written like a 8th grader

Source: “Who is Really to Blame for Climate Change?,” Jocelyn Timperley, BBC Future, 2020.

Fossil fuel firms clearly play a major role in the climate problem. A major report released in 2017 attributed

70% of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions over the previous two decades to just 100 fossil fuel

producers. An update last year outlined the top 20 fossil fuel firms behind a third of emissions.

But it is not only through their ongoing extraction of fossil fuels that these companies have had such a huge

impact on climate action. They have also worked hard to shape the public narrative. In 2015, an investigation

by US website InsideClimate News revealed that the oil firm Exxon knew about climate change for decades

and led efforts to block measures to cut emissions. Revelations like this have contributed to strong public

anger at fossil fuels firms. Many now think that such companies have said and done everything they could to

be able to continue extracting and burning fossil fuels – no matter the cost.

Amy Westervelt is a climate journalist who has spent years exploring the thinking behind big oil’s strategy

over the past decades. She says there was a point in the late 1970s when oil companies in the US like

Exxon appeared to be embracing renewables and increasingly viewing themselves as energy companies,

rather than just oil companies. But this mindset had changed completely by the early 1990s due to a series

of oil crises and changing leadership, she says. “There was this real sort of shift in mindset from ‘If we have

a seat at the table, we can help to shape the regulations,’ to ‘We need to stop any kind of regulation

happening.’”

Fossil fuel firms have since done “a great job” of making any kind of environmental concerns seem elitist,

adds Westervelt. For example, Rex Tillerson, the Exxon chief executive who went on to be US secretary of

state, repeatedly argued that cutting oil use to fight climate change would make poverty reduction harder.

“They have this talking point...that if you want to make that industry cleaner in any way, then you’re basically

unfairly impacting the poor. Never mind that the costs don’t actually have to be offloaded onto the public.”

At the same time, fossil fuel companies have long employed PR tactics in a bid to control the narrative

around climate change, says Westervelt, pushing doubts about the science and working to influence how

people understand the role of fossil fuels in the economy. “They have put a real emphasis on creating

materials for social studies, economics and civics classes that all center the fossil fuel industry,” says

Summarize the important parts of what the speaker is saying

written like a 8th grader

Westervelt. “I think there’s a real lack of understanding about just how much that industry has shaped how

people think about everything, and very deliberately so.”

Fossil fuel companies are a major contributor to climate change, responsible for a large portion of greenhouse gas emissions. They have also worked to shape public opinion about climate change, with some companies even attempting to block measures to cut emissions. These companies have worked to make environmental concerns seem elitist and have used PR tactics to control the narrative around climate change, influencing how people understand the role of fossil fuels in the economy.