What is the difference between a limited war and a total war?(1 point)%0D%0AResponses%0D%0A%0D%0ALimited war focuses on destroying the enemy and has a limited goal. With total war, the goals are not limited and are often numerous and specific. %0D%0ALimited war focuses on destroying the enemy and has a limited goal. With total war, the goals are not limited and are often numerous and specific. %0D%0A%0D%0ALimited war does not target civilians or infrastructure because the invading force is planning to keep the land they conquer. With a total war, those limits do not exist because the goal is destruction of the enemy. %0D%0ALimited war does not target civilians or infrastructure because the invading force is planning to keep the land they conquer. With a total war, those limits do not exist because the goal is destruction of the enemy. %0D%0A%0D%0ALimited war does not target civilians or infrastructure because of the rules of engagement that both sides agree to ahead of time. Total war does not have agreed-upon rules of engagement. %0D%0ALimited war does not target civilians or infrastructure because of the rules of engagement that both sides agree to ahead of time. Total war does not have agreed-upon rules of engagement. %0D%0A%0D%0ALimited war targets civilians and infrastructure because it has a limited scope of focus, while total war targets everything because it has no focus.
Limited war has specific objectives and aims to achieve a particular goal, while total war involves unrestricted warfare targeting all resources, including civilians and infrastructure. Additionally, limited war may involve restrictions on the methods and weapons used, while total war allows for the use of any means necessary to achieve victory.
