Tarshis writes that Thomas and Blalock created blue baby syndrome in animals so that they could figure out how to treat it. What’s your opinion: is animal testing for scientific research and medical advancement justified? Explain.
I think that animal testing for scientific research and medical advancement is…
a complex and controversial issue. On one hand, animal testing has contributed to many medical breakthroughs and advancements that have saved countless human lives. Without animal testing, it would be much more difficult to develop new treatments, vaccines, and surgical procedures.
On the other hand, many people argue that animal testing is cruel and unethical, as animals are subjected to pain and suffering in the name of scientific progress. There are also concerns about the reliability of using animal models to predict human responses, as there are differences between species that can affect the validity of the results.
Ultimately, I believe that there needs to be a balance between the potential benefits of animal testing and the ethical considerations involved. Researchers should be required to follow strict guidelines and regulations to ensure that animals are treated humanely and that alternative methods are explored whenever possible. Additionally, efforts should be made to reduce and replace the use of animals in research through the development of new technologies and methodologies.