How did these Supreme Court cases expand due process protections? Include in your response examples.
Several Supreme Court cases have expanded due process protections by broadening the interpretation of the rights guaranteed under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.
One example is the case of Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), where the Supreme Court ruled that states are required to provide legal defense to criminal defendants who cannot afford to hire their own attorney. This decision expanded the right to counsel in criminal cases, ensuring that individuals are not deprived of their liberty without the opportunity to have a fair trial.
Another example is the case of Miranda v. Arizona (1966), which established the requirement for law enforcement to inform individuals of their constitutional rights, including the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney, before questioning them in custody. This decision expanded the protection against self-incrimination and ensured that individuals are aware of their rights during police interrogations.
Furthermore, the case of Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) expanded due process protections by recognizing the fundamental right to marriage for same-sex couples, prohibiting states from denying them the right to marry. This decision affirmed that all individuals have the right to marry the person of their choosing, regardless of gender, expanding the scope of due process protections to include marriage equality.
Overall, these Supreme Court cases have expanded due process protections by interpreting the Constitution to guarantee fundamental rights and ensure fair treatment in legal proceedings.