Directions: Read the conclusion of both claims below to evaluate the argument, “Should Artificial Intelligence (AI) be used in education?
In a short paragraph, 4 to 5 sentences,
State: What is the claim of each conclusion, summarize each claim. (2 sentences, 2 pts)
State whether the reasoning for each argument is sound? (1 sentence, 1 pt)
Determine does each claim have relevant and sufficient evidence? Explain how you know? (2 sentences, 2 pts)
Conclusion of Claim #1: Based on the stated facts and evidence in the podcast above, using Artificial Intelligence would affect the education of students. The next generation of this world would not have the same ability to write and think clearly. If everyone uses AI to answer questions and write essays, then what is the point of having proper education? Students should all strive to learn and do their best on their own, but if students get used to a chatbot doing it all for them then what true intelligence do they have? Everyone is capable of learning and doing good, they just have to take the time to do so.
Conclusion of Claim #2: In conclusion, AI in education holds lots of potential to enhance personalized learning experiences for students without jeopardizing human connections. By personalizing lessons and providing real time feedback, AI contributes to a more effective educational environment. AI should be embraced for its ability to cater to individual learning needs, as it can adapt to a student's pace and style. Some argue though that AI might hinder human connection in the learning process, but I think the possibilities that AI offers in education are endless, and it’s responsible implementation can ensure a brighter future for students regardless of learning ability
The claim of Claim #1's conclusion is that using AI in education would have a negative impact on students' ability to learn independently and think critically. The claim of Claim #2's conclusion is that AI has the potential to enhance personalized learning experiences for students without compromising human connections.
The reasoning for both arguments seems sound as they both present valid points and considerations surrounding the use of AI in education.
Claim #1 provides relevant evidence by discussing how reliance on AI could hinder students' learning abilities and critical thinking skills. Claim #2 also provides relevant evidence by highlighting the potential benefits of AI in personalizing learning experiences and providing real-time feedback to students. Both claims have sufficient evidence to support their respective arguments.