Analyze this scenario about a real-life Texas citizen and select the principle of the Texas Constitution that best applies: Jamison wants to run for office so he can represent his community. He fills out the correct paperwork but is told he cannot run because of his religion. He sues to get on the ballot and wins the suit.(1 point) Responses The bill of rights protects against religious requirements for government officials. The bill of rights protects against religious requirements for government officials. Separation of powers protects against religious requirements for government officials. Separation of powers protects against religious requirements for government officials. Limited government protects against religious requirements for government officials. Limited government protects against religious requirements for government officials. Federalism protects against religious requirements for government officials.
The principle of the Texas Constitution that best applies to this scenario is the bill of rights, specifically the protection against religious requirements for government officials. Jamison was unfairly barred from running for office due to his religion, which goes against the principles of freedom of religion and equal protection under the law. By winning the lawsuit, Jamison ensured that his constitutional rights were upheld and that he could participate in the democratic process without discrimination based on his religious beliefs.
