The lebering questin asks about what you read in the passage from "King Anther: The Stary of How Ander Became King" and the passage from "The Legends af King Arthur and He Knights."
Hev de the passages present King Arthur's arigin stary differently?
• "King Arthur" describes Arthur as deserving of his fate, while "The Legends of King Arthur implies there were athens with rightful claims to the throne.
•"King Arthur" describes how Arthur becomes king by chance, while "The Legends of King Arthur" implies the outcome was always predestined.
•"King Arthur" describes the heroism of Arthur, while "The Legends of King Arthur" implies he became king through patience and political smarts.
•"King Arthur" describes how Arthur relied on Merlin as an ally, while "The Legends of King Arthur" implies that Metin played a minimal role in his fate.
Both passages present King Arthur's origin story in slightly different ways. "King Arthur" portrays Arthur as deserving of his fate and becoming king by chance, highlighting his heroism and reliance on Merlin as an ally. On the other hand, "The Legends of King Arthur" implies that there were others with rightful claims to the throne and suggests that the outcome was predestined, with Arthur becoming king through patience and political smarts, with Merlin playing a minimal role in his fate. Overall, while both passages share similarities in their portrayal of King Arthur's journey to kingship, there are subtle differences in emphasis and interpretation of his character and the events surrounding his rise to power.
So is it a,b,c or d?
Based on the comparison between the two passages, the correct answer would be:
c) "King Arthur" describes the heroism of Arthur, while "The Legends of King Arthur" implies he became king through patience and political smarts.