Analyze this scenario about a real-life Texas citizen and select the principle of the Texas

Constitution that best applies:
Jamison wants to run for office so he can represent his community. He fills out the correct
paperwork but is told he cannot run because of his religion. He sues to get on the ballot
and wins the suit. (1 point)
The bill of rights protects against religious requirements for government officials.
Federalism protects against religious requirements for government officials.
Limited government protects against religious requirements for government officials.
Separation of powers protects against religious requirements for government officials.

The principle of the Texas Constitution that best applies to this scenario is the Bill of Rights, which protects against religious discrimination. The Texas Constitution, like the U.S. Constitution, guarantees the freedom of religion and prohibits discrimination based on an individual's religious beliefs. In this scenario, Jamison was able to exercise his right to run for office without facing discrimination based on his religion, thanks to the protections provided by the Bill of Rights.

pick 1 of the 4

The principle of the Texas Constitution that best applies to this scenario is limited government, which protects against religious requirements for government officials. In this case, Jamison was initially told he could not run for office because of his religion, but the limited government principle ensures that government actions are restricted and individuals are not denied their rights based on their religious beliefs. When Jamison sued and won the right to be on the ballot, it exemplified the protection of individual rights and limits on government power in Texas.