What is the connection among sectionalism, slavery, and states' rights as causes of the Civil War? How did the Southern response to the 1860 election results demonstrate this connection
Sectionalism, slavery, and states' rights were interconnected causes of the Civil War. Sectionalism refers to the interests of different regions (North vs South) conflicting with each other, leading to tension and division. Slavery was a major point of contention between the Northern and Southern states, with the North opposing and seeking to abolish it, while the South relied on it economically and defended its legality. States' rights ideology held that individual states had the right to determine their own laws and policies, including slavery.
The Southern response to the 1860 election results, in which Abraham Lincoln, who was anti-slavery, won the presidency, demonstrated this connection. Many Southern states felt that their rights were being threatened by the election of Lincoln, who they believed would work towards the abolition of slavery. In response, several Southern states seceded from the Union and formed the Confederate States of America. Their decision to secede was based on their belief in states' rights and their determination to protect the institution of slavery.
Overall, the connection among sectionalism, slavery, and states' rights as causes of the Civil War is evident in the Southern response to the election of Lincoln, as it highlights the deep-rooted disagreements and divisions between the North and South over these issues.