What do you think is more favorable, a PDL who escaped or stayed in the place of confinement during time of calamities? Justify your answer
It is more favorable for a PDL (person deprived of liberty) to stay in the place of confinement during times of calamities for several reasons:
1. Safety and security: Prisons are designed to be secure facilities with measures in place to protect the inmates from external threats such as natural disasters. By staying in the place of confinement, PDLs are less likely to be exposed to danger or harm during calamities.
2. Access to resources: Prisons are equipped with the necessary resources and infrastructure to provide essential supplies such as food, water, and shelter during emergencies. By staying in the place of confinement, PDLs are more likely to have access to these resources compared to trying to survive on their own outside.
3. Legal implications: Escaping from prison during a time of calamity can lead to legal consequences and further repercussions for the PDL. By staying in the place of confinement, they are adhering to the law and avoiding potential additional charges.
4. Public safety: Escaping PDLs pose a risk to public safety as they may engage in criminal activities or cause harm to others while trying to survive outside the prison walls. By staying in the place of confinement, they are contained and unable to cause harm to the community.
Overall, staying in the place of confinement during times of calamities is more favorable as it ensures the safety and security of the PDL, provides access to essential resources, avoids legal consequences, and protects public safety.