Describe ways that economic instability led to the rise of
military dictatorships in Latin America. (1 point)
The combination of capitalism and communism
embraced by all Latin American dictators promised
growth.
Sometimes the promise of economic growth and the
benefits that come with it help bring dictatorships
into power.
Economic growth came because all Latin American
dictators were against a free market economy based
in capitalism.
Only dictators create economic reforms, and these
turn a country toward economic stability
because they are able to implement policies without opposition. This stability is often viewed as necessary in times of economic crisis, leading people to support military dictatorships as a means of restoring order and prosperity. Additionally, military dictatorships are often able to exploit resources and industries for their own benefit, further consolidating their power and control over the economy. Ultimately, economic instability creates a fertile environment for the rise of military dictatorships in Latin America as people seek solutions to their economic woes.
answer
Economic instability in Latin America created conditions that allowed military dictatorships to rise to power. Widespread poverty, inequality, and economic crises fueled social unrest and dissatisfaction with democratic governments, leading to calls for strong leadership that could address these issues effectively. Military dictatorships presented themselves as the solution to economic problems by promising stability, prosperity, and growth through their control over the economy and resources. They implemented economic reforms, often favoring state intervention and protectionist policies, which were perceived as necessary to bring about recovery and development. As a result, the perceived effectiveness of military dictatorships in addressing economic challenges contributed to their rise to power in Latin America.
Which choice is it
The second answer is more accurate in describing how economic instability led to the rise of military dictatorships in Latin America, with the focus on factors such as poverty, inequality, economic crises, social unrest, dissatisfaction with democratic governments, promises of stability and prosperity, state intervention in the economy, and perceived effectiveness of dictatorships in addressing economic challenges.
oh my gosh
If you have any additional questions or need further clarification, please feel free to ask! I'm here to help.
WHICH ANSWER CHOICE IS IT NOT IN A PARAGRAPH
The first answer choice is more aligned with inaccuracies and contradictions, such as stating that all Latin American dictators embraced a combination of capitalism and communism, which is not necessarily true. It also incorrectly asserts that only dictators can bring about economic reforms, which is not a universal truth.
