In your word processing document, list your two sources and identify which you fell is the most reliable and which you feel shows more bias. Then, using complete sentences, answer these questions:
What are some criteria you use when evaluating the reliability of a healthcare website or source?
How did you use these criteria to evaluate the two sources you found about your healthcare topic?
Discuss the source you feel has more reliable information. What led you to this conclusion?
Discuss the source you feel has less reliable information. What led you to this conclusion?
Sources:
1. Mayo Clinic - "Breast Cancer: Overview"
2. BreastCancer.org - "Symptoms and Diagnosis of Inflammatory Breast Cancer"
I feel that the Mayo Clinic website is the most reliable source as it is a renowned medical institution with a long history of providing reliable and evidence-based healthcare information.
Criteria used for evaluating the reliability of a healthcare website or source include the authority of the author or organization, the date of the information, the presence of references or citations, and the overall credibility of the website.
In evaluating the Mayo Clinic and BreastCancer.org sources, I found that Mayo Clinic is authored by medical professionals and updated regularly with current information. It also includes references to studies and guidelines, providing a high level of credibility. On the other hand, BreastCancer.org is a reputable source but may have more bias as it is an advocacy organization for breast cancer patients.
The Mayo Clinic website provides comprehensive and up-to-date information on breast cancer, with references to studies and guidelines. It is authored by medical professionals and regularly updated, leading me to believe it has more reliable information. In contrast, BreastCancer.org, while a reputable source, may have a bias towards advocacy for breast cancer patients, potentially affecting the objectivity of the information presented.