In a paragraph of 3–5 sentences, compare the two opposing American opinions regarding expansion of U.S. territory after the Spanish-American War..

After the Spanish-American War, there were two opposing American opinions regarding the expansion of U.S. territory. One view, held by imperialists and expansionists, believed in the benefits of acquiring new territories and spreading American influence. They saw expansion as a way to gain resources, markets, and strategic military outposts. On the other hand, anti-imperialists opposed the idea of colonialism and viewed expansion as morally wrong, arguing that it went against American principles of democracy and self-determination. They believed that the United States should focus on its own borders and not meddle in the affairs of other nations. These contrasting views sparked debates and controversies among American leaders and the public in the years following the war.

write it with simpler terms

After the Spanish-American War, some Americans thought it was a good idea to expand and acquire new territories to gain resources and influence. They believed in spreading American power and saw it as a way to improve the country's economy and security. Others, who were against expansion, thought it was wrong to take over other countries and go against the principles of democracy and freedom. They believed the U.S. should focus on its own problems and not get involved in other nations' affairs. These different opinions caused a lot of arguments and debates among Americans.