Which characteristic ultimately led to General McClellan’s replacement as Commander of the Union army? (1 point)
his organizational ability
his organizational ability
his cautious nature on the battlefield
his cautious nature on the battlefield
his reckless nature on the battlefield
his reckless nature on the battlefield
his failure at the first Battle of Bull Run
his failure at the first Battle of Bull Run
his cautious nature on the battlefield
Why did the Dred Scott v. Sandford decision anger Northerners? (1 point)
It made slavery legal in the territories.
it made slavery legal in the territories.
It sought to continue the series of compromises on slavery.
It sought to continue the series of compromises on slavery.
It allowed for expansion of slavery into the North.
It allowed for expansion of slavery into the North.
It created popular sovereignty as the rule for all territories.
It created popular sovereignty as the rule for all territories.
It made slavery legal in the territories.
#10 ESSAY QUESTION
What is the connection among sectionalism, slavery, and states’ rights as causes of the Civil War? How did the Southern response to the 1860 election results demonstrate this connection?
Students should:
Describe each of the causes:
sectionalism
slavery
states’ rights.
Describe how the causes related to one another, identifying appropriate legislation, popular sentiments, and economic conditions, among other factors
Describe how the causes all led to Civil War
Explain how these factors influenced the South’s response to the Election to 1860.
(4 points)
Sectionalism refers to the division within a country based on various interests, values, and beliefs. In the United States, sectionalism was primarily driven by economic differences, cultural distinctions, and political ideologies between the North and the South. The North was largely industrialized, while the South was agrarian and heavily reliant on slave labor. This sectional divide was a significant contributing factor to the outbreak of the Civil War.
Slavery was a deeply entrenched institution in the Southern states, where it played a central role in the economy and society. Slavery was a divisive issue between the North and the South, with the former seeking to abolish it while the latter fought to protect and expand it. The tension and conflicts arising from this fundamental difference in opinion on slavery heightened sectionalism and eventually led to the Civil War.
States' rights pertained to the idea that individual states had the authority to govern themselves independently of the federal government. Southern states strongly believed in states' rights, especially concerning issues like slavery and tariffs. This belief was used to justify secession from the Union during the Civil War, with Southern states arguing that they had the right to govern themselves and protect their interests, including the institution of slavery.
The connection among sectionalism, slavery, and states' rights as causes of the Civil War was intricate and interwoven. The economic reliance on slavery in the Southern states deepened the sectional divide, as diverging economic interests fueled political disagreements over the expansion of slavery into new territories. The issue of states' rights further exacerbated tensions by providing a constitutional and ideological basis for the Southern argument of secession.
The Southern response to the 1860 election results, which saw Abraham Lincoln, an anti-slavery candidate, win the presidency, exemplified this connection. Southern states viewed Lincoln's election as a threat to their way of life, particularly regarding slavery and states' rights. In response, several Southern states seceded from the Union, precipitating the Civil War. The Southern secession demonstrated how the combination of sectionalism, slavery, and states' rights ultimately led to the eruption of the Civil War.
shorten it
The connection among sectionalism, slavery, and states' rights as causes of the Civil War was driven by economic, cultural, and political differences between the North and South. The economic reliance on slavery in the South deepened the sectional divide and fueled political disagreements over its expansion. States' rights added to the tension by providing a constitutional basis for secession.
The Southern response to the 1860 election results, with the election of anti-slavery President Lincoln, further accentuated these divisions. Southern states saw this as a threat to their way of life, particularly concerning slavery and states' rights. This led to Southern secession and ultimately, the outbreak of the Civil War, demonstrating how these factors were interconnected and culminated in a significant historical event.