How does this statement show the legal reasoning behind the Supreme Court's decision in the case and its impact on the status of sla**s in the United States during that time period? (1 point) Responses
It established the principle of popular sovereignty in determining the status of sla**s.
It reinforced the idea that sla**s were considered property under federal law.
It made the Fugitive Sla** Act illegal and granted freedom to enslaved individuals.
It affirmed the rights of sla**s as citizens under the Constitution
The statement "It reinforced the idea that sla**s were considered property under federal law" shows the legal reasoning behind the Supreme Court's decision in the case and its impact on the status of sla**s in the United States during that time period. The decision in the case upheld the principle that sla**s were considered property under federal law, denying them the rights and freedoms granted to citizens. This decision further entrenched the institution of sla**ry in the United States and reinforced the idea that sla**s were not entitled to the same legal protections as free citizens.
