Judicial activism by the Supreme Court refers to when the Court exceeds its traditional role of interpreting the law and acts as a policy-making body by making bold decisions that may go beyond what the Constitution or laws explicitly state. This can involve interpreting vague or ambiguous language in the law in a way that expands rights or imposes new obligations on society. Critics of judicial activism argue that it undermines the separation of powers and the democratic process by allowing unelected judges to make decisions that should be left to elected officials. Supporters, on the other hand, argue that judicial activism is necessary to protect individual rights and ensure that laws align with the principles of justice and fairness.
