Which is the best summary of the Missouri Compromise?
To resolve the conflict between large and small states, Congress was given two houses.
To resolve the issue of the extension of slavery into the Louisiana Territory, a line was drawn dividing future free and slave states.
To resolve the dispute between free and slave states, each slave was counted as three fifths of a person for purposes of both taxation and representation.
To resolve the issue of the admission of California as a free state, a tougher fugitive slave law was enacted.
To resolve the issue of the extension of slavery into the Louisiana Territory, a line was drawn dividing future free and slave states.
They began to view it as a moral problem.
It reopened debate over the border between free and slave states.
Wilmot Proviso
- naval blockade
- seizing control of the Mississippi River
his cautious nature on the battlefield
It made slavery legal in the territories.
What does the author mean in saying that popular sovereignty "undermined the Missouri compromise"?
It maintained the division of free and slave states.
• It expanded slavery to the Northern free states.
It forced slaves who had escaped to be returned to a slave state.
• It reopened debate over the border between free and slave states.
In what way did Uncle Tom's Cabin change the attitude of Northerners about slavery?
They began to view it as a political problem.
They began to view it as an economic problem.
They began to view it as a moral problem.
They began to feel it was none of their concern.
As leader of the Republican Party, Lincoln was outspoken in his views on slavery and expressed them during the debates of 1858. Which of the following would best fit with his position?
• Compromise of 1850
• Wilmot Proviso
• Kansas-Nebraska Act
Dred Scott decision
Which two of the following were strategies used by the Union during the Civil War?
• naval blockade
• defensive war
seizing control of the Mississippi River
• relying on European countries for supplies
Which characteristic ultimately led to General McClellan's replacement as Commander of the Union army?
his cautious nature on the battlefield
his organizational ability
his reckless nature on the battlefield
his failure at the first Battle of Bull Run
Why did the Dred Scott v. Sandford decision anger Northerners?
• It made slavery legal in the territories.
• It sought to continue the series of compromises on slavery.
• It allowed for expansion of slavery into the North.
• It created popular sovereignty as the rule for all territories.
#10 ESSAY QUESTION
What is the connection among sectionalism, slavery, and states' rights as causes of the Civil War? How did the Southern response to the 1860 election results demonstrate this connection?
Students should:
Describe each of the causes:
• sectionalism
• slavery
• states' rights.
Describe how the causes related to one another, identifying appropriate legislation, popular sentiments, and economic conditions, among other factors
Describe how the causes all led to Civil War
Explain how these factors influenced the South's response to the Election to 1860.
Sectionalism, slavery, and states' rights were interconnected causes that contributed to the outbreak of the Civil War in the United States. Sectionalism refers to the growing divide between the Northern and Southern regions of the country, fueled by differences in economic systems, social structures, and political beliefs. The North, primarily industrialized, favored tariffs and infrastructure development to support its economy, while the agrarian South relied heavily on slavery and opposed federal intervention that could threaten its way of life.
Slavery was a central issue that exacerbated sectional tensions as the country expanded westward. The North increasingly viewed slavery as morally wrong and incompatible with its vision of progress and equality, while the South relied on the institution to maintain its economy and social hierarchy. This fundamental difference in attitudes towards slavery further deepened the divide between the regions.
States' rights played a significant role in the lead-up to the Civil War, with Southern states arguing for the rights of individual states to make decisions independently from the federal government, including the right to own slaves. The debate over states' rights intensified as the federal government sought to impose restrictions on the expansion of slavery, leading to heightened tensions between the North and South.
These causes were interconnected, as each one fueled the others and contributed to the growing rift between the North and South. The Compromise of 1850, the Kansas-Nebraska Act, and the Dred Scott decision were legislative actions that further inflamed these tensions by attempting to address the territorial expansion of slavery and states' rights issues.
Ultimately, these factors culminated in the outbreak of the Civil War in 1861. The Southern response to the election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860 exemplified these connections, as Southern states viewed Lincoln's victory as a threat to their way of life and the institution of slavery. Several Southern states seceded from the Union in response to the election results, asserting their states' rights to govern themselves and protect the institution of slavery.
In conclusion, sectionalism, slavery, and states' rights were intertwined causes that led to the Civil War by exacerbating regional divisions and deepening ideological differences between the North and South. The Southern response to the 1860 election results highlighted these connections and ultimately set the stage for the conflict that followed.
Shorter
Sectionalism, slavery, and states' rights were interconnected causes that led to the Civil War. Sectionalism created a divide between the North and South, with differing economic systems and social structures. The issue of slavery deepened this divide, as the North opposed it on moral grounds while the South relied on it. States' rights further fueled tensions, with the South asserting its autonomy, especially concerning slavery.
These causes intertwined, with legislation like the Compromise of 1850 and the Kansas-Nebraska Act exacerbating differences. The election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860 further polarized the nation, with the Southern response exemplifying these connections by seceding from the Union to protect states' rights and slavery.
In summary, sectionalism, slavery, and states' rights were key factors leading to the Civil War, with the Southern response to the 1860 election results demonstrating how these causes intertwined and escalated the conflict.