What “preservation controversy” developed over the years relating to Michelangelo’s paintings in the Sistine chapel
One major preservation controversy that developed over the years relating to Michelangelo's paintings in the Sistine Chapel was the decision to clean and restore the frescoes in the late 20th century. The frescoes had accumulated centuries worth of grime, dust, and even previous restoration attempts, which had darkened the original colors and obscured the details of Michelangelo's work.
The controversial cleaning and restoration project, carried out between 1980 and 1994, was met with criticism from some art historians and conservationists who argued that the cleaning process was too aggressive and removed layers of the original paint. They also contended that certain areas of the frescoes had been over-painted in previous restorations, and the removal of these layers would alter the original intent of the artist.
On the other hand, supporters of the restoration argued that the cleaning was necessary to reveal the true beauty of Michelangelo's work and preserve it for future generations. They believed that the intervention was necessary to remove the discolored varnish and grime that obscured the frescoes, and that the restoration efforts were carefully carried out by experienced conservators.
Overall, the restoration of the Sistine Chapel sparked a heated debate among art historians, conservationists, and the general public about the balance between preserving the original work of art and ensuring its longevity for future generations.