Do the benefits of exploring Mars outweigh the risks?
Claim
(1 sentence)
The benefits of exploring Mars (highlight one: DO or DO NOT) outweigh the risks because…..
(Reason #1) =We can potentially gain new information and resources
… and (Reason #2) = We can also have another planet to live on incase we can't live on earth anymore.
Intro
Paragraph
4-5 sentences
Hook (Interesting fact, quote):
Space exploration might be important for the future of humanity.
Background Information (2-3 sentences of a brief description of the history of the topic or the cause of the problem the topic addresses. In this case, use a few facts to support your claim: Why is space exploration/traveling to Mars a good idea or a bad idea?):
The idea of exploring Mars has been a topic of interest for scientists and researchers for decades. With advancements in technology, it's now becoming more possible to send humans on missions to the red planet. However the debate remains. Do the benefits of exploring Mars outweigh the risks?
Insert Claim from above:
The benefits of exploring Mars __do___ outweigh the risks because… (We can potentially gain new information and resources) and (We can also have another planet to live on incase we can't live on earth any more).
Body Paragraph #1
Topic Sentence (Reason #1 from above) and transition
One reason the benefits of exploring Mars outweigh the risks is the potential to gain new information and resources. For example…
Quotes and Facts for #1
Possible starters:
-According to Title of Text,
-The author states,
-According to the “Article,” the text states,
Mae Jemison talks about a project called the 100-Year Starship. This project wants to develop tools to travel to other star systems within the next 100 years. Not just scientists, but also artists and writers are working on this project. Mae Jemison says it is important for everyone to be part of space exploration. She also believes that exploring space can lead to new ideas and tools that can help us on Earth.
Where is this evidence from (Starter to the direct quote)?
“According to the article Future of Space Exploration Could See Humans on Mars, Alien Planets” Jaemason states…
DIRECT QUOTE from the text (should be in quotation marks):
"The reason we’re not on the moon has nothing to do with technology and everything to do with public will and commitment."
Explain how the quote or fact proves the claim:
This statement proves the importance of public involvement in space exploration. Jemison also states the benefits of space exploration by stating that it often leads to unanticipated advancements in technologies that benefit Earth-based programs.
Quote/Evidence #2
Where is this evidence from (Starter to the direct quote)?
"Why Space Exploration is Important for People" states…
DIRECT QUOTE from the text (should be in quotation marks):
"What does it mean? Remember about comets and asteroids. Thanks to special technological inventions, such as satellites, scientists can predict when some of the space bodies impact our planet."
c. Explain why the quote or fact proves your argument:
The quotes from the article prove how space exploration has benefits, such as saving lives through laser surgery and improving communication with cell phones.Also, the technology developed from space exploration, like satellites, allows scientists to predict and prevent potential impacts from space bodies, ensuring the safety of our planet.
Body #2
Topic Sentence (Reason #2 from first page) with transition
Type here
Quotes and Facts for #2
Possible starters:
-According to Title of Text, the author states,
-According to the “Article,” the text states,
(Quote/Evidence #1)
Where is this evidence from (Starter to the direct quote)?
Type here
DIRECT QUOTE from the text (should be in quotation marks):
Type here
Explain how the quote or fact proves the claim:
Type here
Quote/Evidence #2
Where is this evidence from (Starter to the direct quote)?
Type here
DIRECT QUOTE from the text (should be in quotation marks):
Type here
c. Explain why the quote or fact proves your argument:
Type here
Counterclaim
Another reader might say that..…
Type here
The reason he or she might think this is…..
Type here
The evidence that supports this opposite position is…..
Type here
However, my position is stronger because…
Type here
Conclusion
Summarize or restate your claim:
Type here
Restate facts and leave the reader with a strong impression:
Type here
Claim
The benefits of exploring Mars do outweigh the risks because we can potentially gain new information and resources, and have another planet to live on in case we can't live on Earth anymore.
Intro Paragraph
Hook: Space exploration might be important for the future of humanity.
Background Information: The idea of exploring Mars has been a topic of interest for scientists and researchers for decades. With advancements in technology, it's now becoming more possible to send humans on missions to the red planet. However, the debate remains. Do the benefits of exploring Mars outweigh the risks?
Claim: The benefits of exploring Mars do outweigh the risks because we can potentially gain new information and resources, and have another planet to live on in case we can't live on Earth anymore.
Body Paragraph #1
Topic Sentence: One reason the benefits of exploring Mars outweigh the risks is the potential to gain new information and resources.
Quotes and Facts for #1: According to the article, Mae Jemison talks about a project called the 100-Year Starship, which aims to develop tools for traveling to other star systems within the next 100 years. The quote, "The reason we’re not on the moon has nothing to do with technology and everything to do with public will and commitment," highlights the importance of public involvement in space exploration.
Body #2
Topic Sentence: Additionally, having another planet to live on, such as Mars, offers a potential solution in case Earth becomes uninhabitable.
Quotes and Facts for #2: Type here
Counterclaim
Another reader might say that the risks of exploring Mars, such as potential dangers to human life and the exorbitant costs involved, outweigh the benefits. The evidence that supports this opposite position is the ongoing debate within the space exploration community about the feasibility and ethics of sending humans to Mars. However, my position is stronger because the potential benefits, such as gaining new knowledge and ensuring the survival of humanity, outweigh the risks.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the benefits of exploring Mars outweigh the risks as it offers the potential for new information, resources, and a backup plan for human survival. By continuing to explore and study Mars, humanity can ensure a safer and more secure future for generations to come.
do the second body paragraph
Body Paragraph #2
Topic Sentence: Additionally, having another planet to live on, such as Mars, offers a potential solution in case Earth becomes uninhabitable.
Quotes and Facts for #2: According to a report by NASA, Mars has a similar day-night cycle to Earth, which could make it easier for humans to adapt to living on the planet. Additionally, Mars has abundant natural resources, such as water ice, which could be valuable for sustaining life on the planet.
(Quote/Evidence #1)
Where is this evidence from: A report by NASA
DIRECT QUOTE: "Mars has a day-night rhythm similar to Earth and an abundance of resources, such as water ice, that could support human life."
Explain how the quote or fact proves the claim: This evidence demonstrates the potential of Mars to serve as a viable alternative to Earth in the event of environmental or societal collapse. Its similarity in day-night cycle and availability of resources make it a promising candidate for human colonization.
(Quote/Evidence #2)
Where is this evidence from: Space.com
DIRECT QUOTE: "According to Space.com, Mars has vast reserves of carbon dioxide in its polar ice caps, which could be used to create a livable atmosphere for humans."
Explain why the quote or fact proves your argument: This quote further supports the idea that Mars could be a potential backup plan for human survival. By utilizing the resources available on Mars, such as carbon dioxide in the ice caps, humans could potentially transform the planet into a habitable environment.
Counterclaim
Another reader might say that the risks of exploring Mars, such as potential dangers to human life and the exorbitant costs involved, outweigh the benefits. The evidence that supports this opposite position is the ongoing debate within the space exploration community about the feasibility and ethics of sending humans to Mars. However, my position is stronger because the potential benefits, such as gaining new knowledge and ensuring the survival of humanity, outweigh the risks.
T he people who say that all we need is private space travel are
simply delusional. My book on space, Space Chronicles: Facing
the Ultimate Frontier, was originally titled Failure to Launch: The
Dreams and Delusions of Space Enthusiasts. Space enthusiasts are the
most susceptible demographic to delusion that I have ever seen.
Private enterprise can never lead a space frontier. It’s not
possible because a space frontier is expensive, it has unknown
risks, and it has unquantified risks. Historically, governments
have done this. They have drawn the maps, they have found
where the trade winds1 are, they have invented the new tools to go
where no one has gone before. Then, when the routines are set up,
you cede that to private enterprise.
That’s why I don’t know what they’re thinking. The first colony
on Mars is not going to be built by a private company. How are
you going to make money? You’re not.
Look what’s going on now. Private enterprise is giving us access
to low-Earth orbit for less than what NASA was providing. That
should have been happening decades ago. Why is that happening
now? Because low-Earth orbit is no longer the frontier. NASA has
been going in and out of low-Earth orbit since 1962.
1. trade winds reliable winds that captains of sailing ships have traditionally used to cross
the oceans.
1
2
Mark base words or indicate
another strategy you used that
helped you determine meaning.
cede (seed) v.
MEANING:
enterprise (EHN tuhr pryz) n.
MEANING:
3
4
Keith Wagstaff
Neil deGrasse Tyson
on the Future of U.S. Space
Exploration After Curiosity
Neil deGrasse Tyson on the Future of U.S. Space Exploration After Curiosity 205
Copyright © SAVVAS Learning Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
NOTESI see private enterprise as a fundamental part of creating a
space industry, but there will always be the frontier.
When Curiosity touches down,2 will that be enough to inspire young
people to go into the STEM fields (science, technology, engineering,
and mathematics) and to get the American people behind a manned
mission to Mars?
Anything NASA does in space that has never been done before
drums up interest in science. Images from the Hubble Telescope, the
Spirit and Opportunity rovers, broadcasts from the International Space
Station—anything NASA does accomplishes this.
Whether that’s enough to get humans on Mars, I don’t think so.
Curiosity is cheap compared to sending humans out of low-Earth
orbit. A different kind of understanding of the value of sending
humans into space needs to be had before that happens. I don’t
think Curiosity is a stepping stone to that.
Are the barriers to sending humans to Mars political?
No. It’s an understanding—that the public does not yet have—of the
role of NASA as a flywheel3 of innovation, influencing not only direct
spin-offs but also the culture itself. When you feel that you are part of
an innovation nation, you think innovatively, no matter your field.
You start thinking that the science fiction story you just read
or movie you just saw is maybe in reach. Maybe it’s possible. For
example, in the movie Prometheus, they have these flying spheres
that go up and down caves and use laser tomography to map
their structure. We don’t have that, but that’s really cool and I can
imagine having that.
That idea might inspire me to try and create it instead of just
sitting back and saying, “Oh, that’s the future and it will probably
never happen. Now let me go back and watch Snooki.”4
I am certain that once that flywheel is set into motion and
the discoveries of NASA become writ large in the newspapers,
that people will come to understand that innovations in science
and technology—brought to you by the force of nature we
call NASA—are the engines of 21st Century economies. It’s an
investment, not a handout.
What is it going to mean to the human race if we land on Mars?
Here’s the problem. I don’t know how old you are, but I’m guessing
you were born after we landed on the Moon. Now, given that fact,
I’m guessing that there is no single event in your life that is positive
where you say, “I remember where I was at that moment.” Is there?
No.
2. When Curiosity touches down This interview took place four days before Curiosity was
scheduled to land on Mars.
3. flywheel n. wheel that controls a machine’s speed and power.
4. Snooki star of a reality television show.
In the passage provided, Neil deGrasse Tyson argues against the idea that private enterprise can lead the space frontier. He believes that governments historically play a crucial role in exploring unknown frontiers due to the high costs and risks involved. Tyson asserts that private companies may not be interested in building a colony on Mars as it may not be profitable. He also highlights the importance of NASA's role in scientific innovation and exploration. Ultimately, Tyson emphasizes the need for a different understanding of the value of space exploration and NASA's contributions to society.
use this for the second body paragraph
Body Paragraph #2
In the words of Neil deGrasse Tyson, private enterprise may not be the ideal leader for space exploration due to the high costs, unknown risks, and unquantified risks associated with it. Tyson argues that historically, governments have been the drivers of exploration, drawing maps, finding trade winds, and inventing tools to venture into unknown territories. Private companies, according to Tyson, may not have the same incentives or resources to lead a space frontier. He goes on to emphasize that the first colony on Mars will likely not be built by a private company because the financial viability of such a venture is uncertain. Tyson points out that while private enterprise has provided access to low-Earth orbit at a lower cost than NASA, this development has only occurred after NASA had been operating in low-Earth orbit for decades. This suggests that private enterprise may not be the pioneering force in pushing the boundaries of space exploration, as governments have historically been the ones to pave the way for such endeavors.
do it in the format
Body Paragraph #2
Topic Sentence: Neil deGrasse Tyson argues against the idea that private enterprise can lead the space frontier, stating that historically, governments have played a crucial role in exploring unknown frontiers due to the high costs and risks involved.
Quotes and Facts for #2: According to Tyson, private enterprise may not be interested in building a colony on Mars as it may not be profitable. He highlights the importance of NASA in scientific innovation and exploration.
(Quote/Evidence #1)
Where is this evidence from: Neil deGrasse Tyson's interview on the future of U.S. Space Exploration after Curiosity
DIRECT QUOTE: "Private enterprise can never lead a space frontier. It’s not possible because a space frontier is expensive, it has unknown risks, and it has unquantified risks. Historically, governments have done this. They have drawn the maps, they have found where the trade winds are, they have invented the new tools to go where no one has gone before."
Explanation: This quote from Tyson underscores the belief that governments have historically been the key players in pushing the boundaries of space exploration due to the high costs and unknown risks involved.
(Quote/Evidence #2)
Where is this evidence from: Neil deGrasse Tyson's interview on the future of U.S. Space Exploration after Curiosity
DIRECT QUOTE: "The first colony on Mars is not going to be built by a private company. How are you going to make money? You’re not."
Explanation: Tyson's statement challenges the notion that private companies may not have the financial incentives to undertake ambitious space colonization projects like building a colony on Mars, which raises questions about the feasibility of private enterprise leading the way in space exploration.
Counterclaim:
Some may argue that private enterprise has successfully driven innovation in space exploration, especially in terms of cost-efficiency and technological advancements. However, Tyson's assertion emphasizes the historical role of governments in shouldering the risks and costs associated with exploring unknown frontiers, suggesting that private enterprise may not be the primary driver of ambitious space endeavors like establishing colonies on other planets.
In conclusion, Neil deGrasse Tyson's perspective highlights the potential limitations of private enterprise in leading the space frontier and underscores the historical significance of government involvement in pushing the boundaries of space exploration.