Claim 1: During summer vacation, I take a walk every day after lunch. The air is refreshing and helps me prepare for the rest of the day. I also love taking a few minutes to break up the day. I can’t imagine going without my lunchtime walk! During the school year, students should be able to take a walk outside after lunch every day.

Claim 2: Time outside promotes physical health and encourages social interaction and collaboration among students. In addition to anchoring students to the real world, research has shown that time outside leads to greater productivity and better learning outcomes. For these reasons, students should have time outside during every school day.

Question
Use the two claims to answer the question.

How does the style of claim 1 engage the audience in a way that the style of claim 2 does not?

(1 point)
Responses

Claim 1 explains how research supports its claim in order to convey authority to its audience.
Claim 1 explains how research supports its claim in order to convey authority to its audience.

Claim 1 uses informal and subjective language to appeal to the audience in a personal and conversational way.
Claim 1 uses informal and subjective language to appeal to the audience in a personal and conversational way.

Claim 1 explains some benefits of outdoor time in order to gain support from its audience.
Claim 1 explains some benefits of outdoor time in order to gain support from its audience.

Claim 1 uses formal and objective language to convey factual details to the audience.

Claim 1 uses informal and subjective language to appeal to the audience in a personal and conversational way. This style engages the audience by making the claim relatable and showing a personal connection to the topic. In contrast, claim 2 uses formal and objective language to convey factual details, which may not engage the audience in the same personal way. Claim 1's style allows the audience to connect with the writer's personal experience and emotions, making the argument more persuasive and engaging.