Patrick Stewart delivers Titus' long speech from Act III, Scene 1 of Titus Andronicus twice--once in a manner that Barton refers to as "generalized," once not. What specific differences did you notice in the two performances?
In the generalized performance, Patrick Stewart delivers the speech in a more stoic and monotone manner, lacking emotional depth and variation in tone. He speaks the lines in a flat and dispassionate way, failing to convey the intense grief and rage that Titus is feeling.
In the second performance, Patrick Stewart infuses the speech with emotion, using variations in tone and volume to express Titus' complex feelings. He emphasizes certain words and phrases, such as "I shall grind your bones to dust" and "Rome, I make thee promise," to convey Titus' determination for revenge and his loyalty to Rome. Stewart's facial expressions and body language also play a crucial role in conveying the character's emotions, adding depth and intensity to the performance.
Overall, the second performance is much more engaging and evocative, capturing the full range of Titus' emotions and making the speech more impactful for the audience.