Which statement best identifies the impact of constitutional interpretation?(1 point)
Responses
Constitutional interpretations lead to disputes between state and federal courts.
Constitutional interpretations can lead to a change in law enforcement procedures.
Constitutional interpretations do not impact a Supreme Court decision.
Constitutional interpretations create new amendments.
How did the ruling in the Miranda v. Arizona case change law enforcement procedures?(1 point)
Responses
Law enforcement may question a suspect before reading a suspect their rights.
Law enforcement may search a home without a warrant.
Law enforcement must read a suspect their Miranda rights prior to being interrogated.
Law enforcement may interrogate a suspect without the presence of an attorney.
Which statement best identifies how the Second Amendment was interpreted in the McDonald v. Chicago case?(1 point)
Responses
The Second Amendment was interpreted to include the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The Supreme Court does not have the authority to interpret any amendment in the Constitution.
The Second Amendment was interpreted to include the rights included in the First Amendment.
The Supreme Court extended rights that are not explicitly outlined in the Constitution.
Which statement best assesses the impact of the cases Marbury v. Madison and McCulloch v. Maryland on the Constitution?(1 point)
Responses
Both cases increased the powers of the executive branch.
Both cases increased the powers of the federal government.
Both cases did not increase any federal power.
Both cases increased the powers of the judicial branch.
Which statement best explains how the Supreme Court interpreted the Fourth Amendment’s protection from search and seizure in school?(1 point)
Responses
They said that school officials have to have probable cause.
They said that school officials only need reasonable suspicion.
They said that school officials can search whenever they want.
They said that students have the same protection as citizens.