Discuss the increase and decrease of presidential powers. Define “Imperial Presidency” and give two examples of presidents who increased presidential power. What is an advantage and a disadvantage of increasing presidential power?
(4 points)
The increase and decrease of presidential powers is a topic that has been hotly debated throughout American history. There have been instances where presidents have taken steps to increase their power, leading to concerns about the potential for an "Imperial Presidency" where the executive branch has too much control.
The term "Imperial Presidency" refers to a presidency where the executive branch has expanded powers that push the boundaries of the separation of powers outlined in the Constitution. This can lead to an imbalance of power between the branches of government, with the president wielding significant authority.
Two examples of presidents who increased presidential power are:
1. Franklin D. Roosevelt: FDR expanded the powers of the presidency during his time in office, particularly through his New Deal policies aimed at combating the Great Depression. He used executive orders and actions to implement various programs without seeking approval from Congress, effectively expanding the reach of the executive branch.
2. Richard Nixon: Nixon is often cited as a president who sought to consolidate power in the executive branch. His actions during the Watergate scandal, such as the establishment of the "plumbers" unit to investigate political opponents, demonstrated a willingness to push the boundaries of presidential authority.
One advantage of increasing presidential power is that it can lead to more efficient decision-making and implementation of policies. A strong executive branch can act decisively in times of crisis and provide leadership in tackling complex issues.
However, a major disadvantage of increasing presidential power is the potential for abuse and erosion of checks and balances in the government. Concentrating power in the hands of one individual can undermine the principles of democracy and lead to authoritarian tendencies. Additionally, an overly powerful presidency can limit the ability of Congress and the judiciary to hold the executive branch accountable.