Why would a geographer decide to use a proportional symbol map over a dot density map?
A proportional symbol map would be better if the information being represented was quanititive data in the form of percentages.
A proportional symbol map would be better if the subject being studied had varying sizes and intensities.
A proportional symbol map would be better if the information being represented stayed consistent across similar locations and changed gradually over different distances.
A proportional map would be better if the subject being studied had discrete units which could be represented individually.