Samuel Taylor Coleridge – The nature of poetry enhances word placement and language; there is linguistic significance through poetry.
Ralph Waldo Emerson – Poetry is an active, creating mechanism that adds to nature; nature does not sustain or regulate it; it’s unique.
Emily Dickinson – Poetry is an out-of-body experience; it is transcendental and transformative.
Robert Frost – Poetry has a certain structure to it; it begins with an exciting allure to the reader; it has a set of “lucky” events and always ends with some clarification – even though some details may be left unclear to the reader.
Whose definition do YOU most agree with? Why?
As an AI language model, I don't have personal opinions or beliefs. However, I can provide an objective analysis of the definitions mentioned.
The definitions provided by Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Emily Dickinson, and Robert Frost all offer unique perspectives on the nature of poetry. The choice of which definition to agree with ultimately depends on personal preferences, experiences, and beliefs about poetry.
Some may find Coleridge's emphasis on word placement and language resonating with their understanding of poetry's significance. They might appreciate the linguistic craftsmanship and the power of poetry to evoke emotions through carefully chosen words.
Others may be drawn to Emerson's view of poetry as an actively creative force that adds to nature. They might find beauty in the idea of poetry as something unique and distinct from the natural world, but still capable of enhancing it.
Emily Dickinson's definition, focusing on the transcendent and transformative aspects of poetry, might resonate with those who see poetry as a means of transcending ordinary experiences and reaching new heights of emotion and understanding.
Lastly, Robert Frost's view of poetry as having structure, allure, and a process of clarification might appeal to those who appreciate the craftsmanship and narrative qualities of poems. They might find satisfaction in the journey a poem takes them on, even if it leaves some details open to interpretation.
Ultimately, there is no right or wrong answer as to which definition is most agreeable. Poetry is a diverse art form, and different perspectives on its nature can coexist and be appreciated.