Which statement best explains the effects of the emancipation over time?(1 point)
Responses
The emancipation boosted social reform and economic development, and it helped Russia strengthen its long-term weaknesses.
The emancipation boosted social reform and economic development, and it helped Russia strengthen its long-term weaknesses.
The emancipation was successful in abolishing serfdom, but it led to significant conflict and war because of opposition from the people.
The emancipation was successful in abolishing serfdom, but it led to significant conflict and war because of opposition from the people.
The emancipation increased economic development, but it failed to abolish feudal serfdom in Russia.
The emancipation increased economic development, but it failed to abolish feudal serfdom in Russia.
The emancipation boosted social reform and economic development, but it failed to address Russia’s long-term weaknesses.
The emancipation boosted social reform and economic development, but it failed to address Russia’s long-term weaknesses.
Which statement best summarizes the U.S. foreign policy goals from the perspective of peacemaking?(1 point)
Responses
The U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to establish the U.S. as an imperial government in Latin American.
The U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to establish the U.S. as an imperial government in Latin American.
The U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to provide stability and peace in an unstable region.
The U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to provide stability and peace in an unstable region.
U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to overthrow threats to U.S. citizens living in Latin America.
U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to overthrow threats to U.S. citizens living in Latin America.
U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to retreat military forces to establish peace in the U.S.
The U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean intended to provide stability and peace in an unstable region.
Which of the following charts best compares the goals of “big stick” diplomacy and dollar diplomacy?(1 point)
Responses
“Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy
End conflict with military intervention/force
Establish financial stability
Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America
End conflict peacefully
Reduced use of military intervention
Establish U.S. military power
Expand U.S. economic interests
“Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy End conflict with military intervention/force Establish financial stability Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America End conflict peacefully Reduced use of military intervention Establish U.S. military power Expand U.S. economic interests
“Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy
End conflict with military
Establish financial stability
Reduced use of military intervention
Expand U.S. economic interests
End conflict by paying off aggressors
Establish U.S. military power
Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America
“Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy End conflict with military Establish financial stability Reduced use of military intervention Expand U.S. economic interests End conflict by paying off aggressors Establish U.S. military power Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America
“Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy
End conflict peacefully
Establish U.S. military power
Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America
End conflict peacefully
Reduce use of military intervention
Establish financial stability
Expand U.S. economic interests
“Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy End conflict peacefully Establish U.S. military power Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America End conflict peacefully Reduce use of military intervention Establish financial stability Expand U.S. economic interests
“Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy
End conflict non-peacefully
Expand U.S. economic interests
Reduced use of military intervention
Establish financial stability
End conflict with military
Establish U.S. military power
Reinforce US control over Latin America
The emancipation boosted social reform and economic development, and it helped Russia strengthen its long-term weaknesses.
“Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy
End conflict with military intervention/force Establish financial stability Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America
End conflict peacefully Reduced use of military intervention Establish U.S. military power Expand U.S. economic interests