Here's what were supposed to be doing: Put transformation and similarity concepts together to plan a design for a scale model. Showing how these concepts effectively work in the real world involves clear communication and the ability to defend your conclusions to others.
In your post, describe your design to your peers:
State the real-world figure you will model and the scale factor you will use.
Identify at least two different but significant items on your model.
Explain how you will determine the calculations and dimensions for these items to make them mathematically similar to the actual items.
Describe the specific mathematical skills you will need to create the design and give examples.
Describe some outside sources you may need for the calculations./
I will be designing a scale model of the Eiffel Tower, using a scale factor of 1:100. This means that each unit on the model will represent 100 units in the actual tower.
Two significant items on my model will be the observation decks and the arches of the tower.
To determine the calculations and dimensions for these items, I will first gather accurate measurements of the actual tower. For example, I will find the height of the observation decks and the width of the arches. Then, I will multiply these measurements by the scale factor of 1:100 to find the corresponding dimensions for the model.
The specific mathematical skills I will need to create the design include multiplication, division, and proportional reasoning. For example, to determine the height of the observation decks on the model, I will multiply the actual height by the scale factor. To ensure accuracy and proportionality, I will also need to divide measurements by the scale factor to convert model dimensions to their actual counterparts.
For the calculations, I may need outside sources such as architectural blueprints or measurements from official Eiffel Tower documentation. These sources will provide me with precise dimensions and details that will assist me in creating an accurate scale model. Additionally, historical photographs and images of the Eiffel Tower may be useful for capturing the aesthetic details and overall appearance of the structure.
Here's what a peer wrote:
The Great Wall of China. I will use a scale factor of 1:100, which means that each unit of measurement on my model represents 100 units. The arches and the observation deck will be two important components of my model. The Great Wall of China reduces them by dividing each by 100. In my model, the height of the arch will be 3 meters (300/100) if it is 300 meters in real life.
Describe what is effective about the design. (1 sentence)
Describe the flaws or challenges you observe in the design. (1 sentence)
Suggest some improvements in the design. (1 sentence)
The effective aspect of the design is accurately applying the scale factor to determine the dimensions of the arches and observation deck on the model.
A flaw or challenge in the design is not considering the other dimensions of the arches and observation deck, such as width and depth, which may affect the overall proportions of the model.
An improvement in the design could be to gather more comprehensive measurements of the actual Great Wall of China, including width and depth of the arches and observation deck, to ensure the model accurately represents the structure in all dimensions.
Write the same thing but little simpler so it would seem like a human is writing it
The design effectively applies the scale factor to determine the size of the arches and observation deck on the model of the Great Wall of China.
One challenge is that the design only considers the height of the arches and observation deck, without taking into account their width and depth, which could affect the proportions of the model.
To improve the design, it would be helpful to gather more detailed measurements of the actual Great Wall of China, including the width and depth of the arches and observation deck, to ensure the model accurately represents all dimensions of the structure.